Running

·8 min read

Best running cadence: is 180 steps per minute a real thing?

The best running cadence isn't 180 for everyone. What research says about step rate, why it changes with speed, and how to nudge yours up 5% if it's low.

by exrsz

The best running cadence is the one that's right for your speed, your legs and your experience, and for most people it isn't exactly 180 steps per minute. Cadence rises as you run faster, so nobody has one fixed number. The research supports something more modest and more useful: if you're a newer runner with a low cadence and long, reaching strides, nudging your step rate up by about 5% tends to reduce some of the load per step (Heiderscheit et al., 2011). That's it. No magic number.

This post covers what cadence is, where 180 comes from in practice, what the studies actually found, and how to change yours without turning every run into a metronome drill. If you'd rather spend that energy on the training itself, a running plan that knows you lift handles the scheduling.

What running cadence is (and why people obsess over it)

Cadence, or step rate, is the number of steps you take per minute, counting both feet. Most running watches report it automatically. Some report "strides" per minute instead, where a stride is two steps, so 85 strides per minute is 170 steps per minute. Check which one your watch uses before you panic.

Speed is just cadence times step length. To run faster you either take more steps, longer steps, or both. Cadence gets attention because it's easy to measure and easy to change, and because a very low cadence usually comes with overstriding: reaching your foot out in front and landing on a straight leg.

If you're new to running, cadence is not your first problem. Consistency is. A simple starter program of easy runs and a bit of strength will do more for you in three months than any cadence fix. And if your real goal is speed, cadence is one of the smaller levers in how to run faster quickly.

Is 180 steps per minute the best running cadence?

Not as a universal target. 180 is a famous coaching number, but we couldn't find a study showing it's optimal for everyone at every speed, and several point the other way.

Real runners vary a lot. A study of 114,324 runs logged on smartwatches by 227 runners over 4 years, about half of them with a history of knee surgery, found people typically ran at 160 to 180 steps per minute (Carey et al., 2026). Sex and surgical history explained little of the variation in how people ran; the individual runner explained much more.

Cadence changes with speed. In a study of inexperienced runners, self-selected stride frequency rose from 77 to 79 to 80 strides per minute (about 154, 158 and 160 steps per minute) as speed went up from 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.9 m/s, roughly 11:11, 10:19 and 9:15 per mile (van Oeveren et al., 2017). A study of elite and highly trained milers found all of their stride timing measures changed with speed too (Burns et al., 2021). One fixed number for easy runs and intervals makes no sense.

The measured optimum for beginners was below 180. In that same van Oeveren study, the energy-optimal stride frequency (based on heart rate) was about 83 strides per minute, or 166 steps per minute, and it didn't change across the speeds tested. The runners' self-chosen cadence was a bit lower than that, so they had room to go up slightly, but not to 180.

Experienced runners mostly figure it out. Trained runners chose a stride frequency closer to their energy-optimal one than novices did (de Ruiter et al., 2014). Your body is reasonably good at self-selecting cadence, and it gets better with running experience.

So the honest answer: 180 is a rule of thumb, not a target. The best running cadence for you is probably a little above whatever you naturally choose if you're new, and close to what you already do if you've been running for years.

What raising your cadence actually does

This is where cadence earns its reputation, and where the claims need care.

A study of 45 recreational runners on a treadmill at a constant speed found that increasing step rate by 5% or 10% reduced the mechanical energy absorbed at the knee, and 10% also reduced it at the hip. Step length, braking impulse and vertical bounce all went down as step rate went up (Heiderscheit et al., 2011).

A systematic review of ten studies found the same pattern: higher stride rate came with lower vertical movement of the body, lower ground reaction force, and less energy absorbed at the hip, knee and ankle (Schubert, Kempf and Heiderscheit, 2014). The review also noted the limits: small samples, mostly male runners, and different methods between studies.

What that does and doesn't mean:

  • It does mean a slightly quicker step reduces some measures of load per step, at the same speed, in the 5% to 10% range those studies tested.
  • It doesn't mean higher cadence keeps you injury-free. These studies measured mechanics, not injury rates over months.
  • It doesn't mean more is always better. Most of the changes were at +5% to +10%, not +20%.

If you're dealing with pain, cadence changes are something to work through with a physio or sports medicine professional, not a blog post.

Cadence and running economy

Running economy is how much energy a given pace costs. A review of the biomechanics of economy found that using a preferred stride length range, which allows strides up to 3% shorter than your preferred length, appeared beneficial (Moore, 2016). The same review concluded that recommending one general economical running technique should be approached with caution.

Put plainly: a small cadence bump is unlikely to cost you energy, and a big forced one might. If a new cadence feels like you're sprinting in place, you've gone too far.

How to find your cadence

  1. Use your watch. Look at your average cadence on an easy run, a tempo run and a set of strides. Expect it to be different for each.
  2. Or count. Count every time your right foot lands for 30 seconds, then multiply by 4.
  3. Check it at a steady, easy pace. That's the pace where overstriding usually shows up, and the one you run most.

There's no score to beat. You're looking for a baseline.

How to change your running cadence

If your easy-run cadence is on the low side and you can see yourself reaching out in front with each step:

  • Go up about 5%, the smallest change Heiderscheit and colleagues tested. If you're at 160, try 168. Not 180.
  • Use a metronome app or a playlist at your target beat for a few minutes at a time, not the whole run.
  • Keep the pace the same. The goal is shorter, quicker steps at the same speed, not running faster.
  • Practice during strides and drills. Quick, light ground contact is what drills like ankling and A-skips rehearse.
  • Give it weeks. It'll feel odd at first. After a few weeks, check whether your natural cadence has drifted up without the metronome.

Cadence is one cue among several. How to improve your running form covers the rest: posture, where your foot lands, and what your arms are doing. Fix one cue at a time.

What cadence won't fix

Cadence gets more attention than it deserves because it's a number on your watch. The things that move your times more:

  • Running frequency. How often should you run a week matters far more than steps per minute.
  • Easy pace that's actually easy. If you're new, beginner running pace mostly comes down to slowing down enough to keep going.
  • Strength work. If you're starting from zero there too, a beginner workout split of two or three short sessions a week is plenty.

And where you sit compared with others is about fitness, not cadence. Average mile time varies with age, sex and training, and no metronome changes that on its own.

Special cases

  • Bigger bodies. If you're figuring out how to start running when overweight, cadence advice is the same: a slightly quicker, shorter step at an easy pace, built up gradually.
  • Trails. Climbs, descents and roots change your step every few meters. On trail running for beginners, cadence numbers mean even less than on the road. Run by effort and feel.
  • Treadmills. Cadence often creeps up on a treadmill. Compare like with like.

How exrsz handles this

exrsz builds a periodized plan from your goal, schedule, level and equipment, with running and lifting balanced in one plan. It adapts each week to how you actually trained, so the time you'd spend worrying about cadence goes into consistent running instead.

FAQ

What is the best running cadence?

There isn't one number for everyone. Recreational runners commonly run at 160 to 180 steps per minute (Carey et al., 2026), cadence rises with speed, and newer runners may benefit from nudging their natural cadence up by about 5%.

Is 180 steps per minute a myth?

As a universal target, yes. It's a coaching rule of thumb, and one study of inexperienced runners found an energy-optimal cadence of about 166 steps per minute that didn't change across the speeds tested (van Oeveren et al., 2017).

Does increasing cadence reduce injury?

That hasn't been shown directly. Increasing step rate by 5% to 10% reduced load at the knee and hip in a lab study (Heiderscheit et al., 2011), but that measured mechanics, not injury rates.

How do I increase my running cadence?

Raise it about 5% at a time, the smallest increase tested in a lab study of step rate, using a metronome or a playlist at the target beat for short stretches of an easy run, while keeping your pace the same. Give it a few weeks before checking whether it's stuck.

Should my cadence be the same at every pace?

No. Cadence rose with speed in inexperienced runners (van Oeveren et al., 2017), and elite milers' stride timing changed with speed too (Burns et al., 2021). Compare cadence at the same pace, not across different runs.

#running#cadence#form#technique

Pre-launch

You read the whole thing. Now go train.

exrsz builds the plan this post describes and rewrites it every week as you train. Founding price locked, Ruthless on day one.

doors open soon · founding price locked · zero spam

More